Dear Poor Lucky Me,
Whose story do you think is more believable:
Did Larry Craig have a “wide stance” or was this guy, Mike Duvall really just “engaged in inappropriate storytelling”?
I have to tell you that I am more likely to believe Duvall because I can’t imagine some hot-stuff lobbyist letting this turd spank her.
Also, are there any normal lawmakers out there? I am not saying that it is not normal to be spanked, but I am saying that all of these politicians excel at “do as I say and not as I do”!
With Regards,
Jack in Wisconsin
Dear Jack,
The thing about Duvall’s situation is that there are a lot of insecure insane people in the world who would sex up anyone who has a modicum of power. I knew a manager at KFC who got laid like carpet because he was in charge of the shift calender.
But if I was pressed to pick one, I would say that “inappropriate story telling” is way more believable than “wide stance”. Wide stance is about the stupidest/awesomest thing I’ve ever heard.
I’m so grateful for Larry Craig, because now I can safely assume that anyone who is really adamant about “family values” or viciously against gay marriage is just a closeted homosexual. On the other hand, maybe I’ve never really understood what family values means. Maybe it just means “be straight at home and gay in a public bathroom or truck stop”.
I don’t know about honest lawmakers, but I think that we should demand an IQ standard. If you are a politician and know know you’ve got a mic on while you’re talking about your various girlfriends underpants and sex fetishes, you are an idiot. Haven’t these people seen Naked Gun for god’s sake? It’s an old joke!
Sincerely,
Poor Lucky Me
